- 12 November 2010
- Published in Lifestyle
For some, being polyamorous provides more love and support for the kids than does being in a monogamous household.
Polyamory -- the notion that committed love relationships can involve more than two consenting adults -- is a bit like swinging, with one key difference: Love and commitment are the focus, not sexual hookups. For some, polyamorous relationships involve three or more adults, and no other new partners ever enter the equation. For others, polyamory becomes an even more fluid family dynamic.
Raising kids in a polyamorous household has its advantages, say polyamorists. After all, more adults means more hands to help with household chores such as doing laundry, making dinner, getting kids ready for bed and scheduling playdates. With more adults, there's also more money to go around. Kids enjoy the benefits of a large, extended family network. Polyamorous parents insist that their kids also learn valuable communication skills simply from watching their parents navigate the tricky terrain of managing more than one lover at a time.
- 22 October 2009
- Published in About PolyOz
About PolyOz
Imagine For A Moment......
A Community Where Love Is Abundant, Where Spirit Is Honoured, And Where The Body Is Sacred.
This Is Truly, Love Without Limits. PolyOz Is Building Such A Community.
This Site Reflects Who We Are, And Our Place Within The Polyamorous Lifestyle.
Join Us On An Adventure Into The Exploration Of Your True Essence. Allow Your Heart To Expand And Discover A New Richness Deep Within Your Being.
PolyOz Statement of Purpose
1. To provide an educational forum for interested support groups, individuals and families concerning the social, medical, legal, personal, interpersonal and moral issues involving ethical, committed, and egalitarian non-monogamy.
2. To provide assistance, including various print and non-print informational resources, to interested support groups, individuals and families concerning the social, medical, legal, personal, interpersonal and moral issues involving ethical, committed, and egalitarian non-monogamy.
3. To provide a supportive and non-judgmental environment for the free discussion of the issues involving ethical, committed, and egalitarian non-monogamy.
4. To inform the general public at large of the significant differences between ethical, committed, and egalitarian non-monogamy and the more common, harmful and stereotypical forms of non-monogamy: e.g. adultery, swinging, and traditional sexist polygamy.
5. To provide other support groups, general public groups and associations with a speakers' bureau and similar resources, to help correct the adverse stereotypes associated with the various forms of non-monogamy.
6. To offer events and organize venues for the gathering of interested individuals and families, so as to provide an environment of acceptance and mutual support for this small and misunderstood minority and to provide assistance where requested to groups throughout Australia to establish such venues and events on an ongoing basis.
- 11 April 2007
- Published in Australian Poly News
POLYFIDELITY: THE CONTEMPORARY EGALITARIAN REINCARNATION OF POLYGAMY
-PRESENTED TO THE W. A. SEXOLOGY SOCIETY 17 FEBRUARY 1993
BY CARL W. TURNEY CO-FOUNDER BEYOND MONOGAMY INC.
TRIADYou want to know how it will be
Me and her or you and me
You both sit there, with your long hair flowing
Your eyes are alive; your minds are still growing
Saying to me "What can we do now that we both love you"
I love you too
But I don't really see, why can't we go on as three
You are afraid, embarrassed too
No one has ever said such a thing to you
Your mother's ghost stands at your shoulder
Got a face like ice, just a little colder
Saying to you "You can not do that
It breaks all the rules you learned in school"
I don't really see, why can't we go on as three
We love each other it's plain to see
There's just one answer comes to me
Sister lovers -- water brothers
And in time, maybe others
So you see what we can do, is to try something new --
That is if you're crazy too
I don't really see why can't we go on as three
David Crosby
Crosby, Stills, Nash & Young

